Colson and McLaren

Charles Colsen and Nancy Pearcey, in their book "How Now Shall We Live" deal at length with the definition and ramifications of postmodernism in Western society. They trace it back to existentialism and are of the opinion that its nonjudgmentalism and moral relativism are responsible for antiChristian sentiment and much of the problems in our society today. You seem to define and apply postmodernism differently. Is there a difference, and if so, can we reconcile what Colsen is saying with what you are saying?

Yes, you’re right: there is a difference. Chuck’s characterization (postmodern = relativistic, nihilistic, anti-Christian) is, I think, terribly flawed. He’s right – there are dangers in postmodernity. But I think Chuck Colson is much more sanguine about modernity than I am, which explains a large part of our difference. In my newest book, A Generous Orthodoxy, I have a chapter called “emergent,” and I think it will also be helpful in this regard. I should also add that in spite of the areas in which Chuck and I may disagree, I have great respect for him, and we agree on the most important things.